{"id":728,"date":"2018-01-21T14:44:57","date_gmt":"2018-01-21T22:44:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/?page_id=728"},"modified":"2020-06-01T11:42:18","modified_gmt":"2020-06-01T18:42:18","slug":"the-quadruple-twist","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/the-quadruple-twist\/","title":{"rendered":"The Quadruple Twist"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Twisting a fairly plain 3D shape can result in much more interesting geometry for 3D printing.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/do-the-twist\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">This page<\/a>\u00a0explains how I made a fairly straightforward part using a double twist process. I have wanted to use this technique on more designs, but was not able to publish any because of problems with slicing that resulted from overlapping shells and the inability of most slicers to deal with them properly.<\/p>\n<p>Fortunately the release of Netfabb&#8217;s new online STL repair service at\u00a0https:\/\/service.netfabb.com allows STL files with overlapping shells to be repaired well enough for most slicers to process them OK. So with this in mind I decided to try doing a quadruple twist design.<\/p>\n<p>My initial results were not all that good. I found that the end result was highly dependent on the twist parameters give to the geometry in the steps going from 1 to 2 to 3 to 4 twists. I found that using the same amount of twist for 1 and 2,\u00a0 and for 3 &amp; 4 gave the most symmetric results, and these all looked better than non-symmetric ones. Here are screenshots of how, by accident actually, I\u00a0 hit on what I finally decided to print.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">Untwisted geometry<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-744\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/notwist.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"396\" height=\"549\" srcset=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/notwist.jpg 396w, https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/notwist-216x300.jpg 216w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 396px) 100vw, 396px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-729\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Untwisted.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"515\" height=\"513\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This is a fairly straightfoward shape made by lofting a single curve that I put into 2 different circular arrays.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">Single twist<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-745\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/singletwist.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"382\" height=\"540\" srcset=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/singletwist.jpg 382w, https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/singletwist-212x300.jpg 212w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 382px) 100vw, 382px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-730\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Single.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"492\" height=\"538\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This is what you&#8217;d expect from a single twist. It&#8217;s fine, but not particularly interesting.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\">Double twist<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-746\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/doubletwist.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"378\" height=\"532\" srcset=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/doubletwist.jpg 378w, https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/doubletwist-213x300.jpg 213w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 378px) 100vw, 378px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-731\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Double.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"517\" height=\"547\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Certainly far more interesting than a single twist, but I wondered &#8211; what if I twisted this one?<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt;\">Triple twist<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-736\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Triple.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"632\" height=\"583\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-747\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/tripletwist.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"414\" height=\"549\" srcset=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/tripletwist.jpg 414w, https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/tripletwist-226x300.jpg 226w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 414px) 100vw, 414px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This was a surprising result and I thought it looked interesting. But the fact that it was non-symmetrical bothered me, so of course I tried&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #000000;\"><strong>Quadruple twist<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-748\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/4wrong.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"440\" height=\"549\" srcset=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/4wrong.jpg 440w, https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/4wrong-240x300.jpg 240w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 440px) 100vw, 440px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-737\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Quadruple-Wrong.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"638\" height=\"612\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This had nice symmetry, but it just looked too busy and complicated. I tried a lot of different twist angles but they all looked this bad &#8211; or far worse. I finally hit on a twist angle that produced this:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-749\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/quadrupletwist.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"438\" height=\"541\" srcset=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/quadrupletwist.jpg 438w, https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/quadrupletwist-243x300.jpg 243w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 438px) 100vw, 438px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-738\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Quadruple.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"524\" height=\"547\" \/><\/p>\n<p>What good luck &#8211; this one had the right amount of complexity and symmetry, so I ran it through the Netfabb repair service (because no slicer could handle the unrepaired STL file) and printed it.\u00a0 Here&#8217;s the final result:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-751\" src=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/IMG_20180121_101721_DRO-789x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"610\" height=\"792\" srcset=\"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/IMG_20180121_101721_DRO-789x1024.jpg 789w, https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/IMG_20180121_101721_DRO-231x300.jpg 231w, https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/IMG_20180121_101721_DRO-768x997.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The STL file for this is\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thingiverse.com\/thing:2765149\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">here<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/pinshape.com\/items\/42199-3d-printed-quadrupletwistvase1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Last Update: 21 Jan 2018<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Twisting a fairly plain 3D shape can result in much more interesting geometry for 3D printing.\u00a0This page\u00a0explains how I made a fairly straightforward part using a double twist process. I have wanted to use this technique on more designs, but was not able to publish any because of problems with slicing that resulted from overlapping [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-728","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/728","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=728"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/728\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1192,"href":"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/728\/revisions\/1192"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/birkbinnard.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=728"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}